Cancer Book-Chapter 6

Some Statistics
One American dies of cancer every minute! That’s over 1,400
people per day – enough to fill four fully loaded jet planes. That’s
over half a million Americans each year. This is staggering!
In his book, Don’t Waste Your Life, John Piper quotes Ralph Winter
on pages 115-116. “Satan has, horrifyingly, employed his rebellious
freedom in the development of destructive germs and viruses at the
microbial level, which today account for 1/3 of all deaths on the
planet…(however all of the) funded projects of the federal National
Cancer Institute are focused on chemo and radiation treatment, not
prevention. It’s like getting caught up in 150 Vietnam wars at the
same time – as far as battle deaths are concerned. And yet we act as
though no war exists! How can the consciousness of America be
“The cause of cancer is clear: poor diet, lifestyle and
poor mental attitude result in toxic buildup which
overloads the self-cleansing mechanism. Cancer is
manifestation of long term nutritional and
environmental irritation, resulting in cellular oxygen
starvation, leading to uncontrolled cell replication.”
Dr. Saul Pressman
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
102
aroused to the fact that 1/3 of all women and 1/2 of all men will
contract cancer before they die?”
Have you lost a loved one to cancer? It seems like everyone I know
has cancer or has a loved one with cancer. Finding out that you or a
loved one has cancer can be absolutely terrifying. When my father
died in 1996, it inspired me to get to the bottom of what causes
cancer and what treatments actually work to stop this terrible
disease.
Consider these facts:
􀂾 Each year in the United States, we spray over a billion
pounds of pesticides on our crops
􀂾 We feed millions of pounds of antibiotics to our farm
animals
􀂾 We inject our cattle with cycle after cycle of growth
hormone
􀂾 We eat grains contaminated with mycotoxins (fungal toxins)
􀂾 We dump billions of tons of toxic waste into our waste sites
and rivers
􀂾 We unknowingly poison our children with vaccinations
􀂾 We drink water that has been poisoned by chlorine and
fluoride and other chemicals
􀂾 We drink diet sodas contaminated with aspartame
􀂾 We let dentists fill our mouth with mercury fillings and root
canals
􀂾 We let doctors destroy our bodies with X-rays
􀂾 We smoke cigarettes and drink lots of alcohol
􀂾 We eat mainly junk food, fast food, and processed food
Is it any wonder we are sick all the time?
What Causes Cancer?
Cancer is not a mysterious disease that suddenly attacks you out of
the blue, something that you cannot do anything to prevent. It has
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
103
definite causes that you can correct if your body has enough time,
and if you take action to change your internal terrain to one that
creates health (rather than cancer) while at the same time attacking
cancerous cells by exploiting their weaknesses. Overcoming cancer
is a process of reversing the conditions that allowed the cancer to
develop. It is critical to note that cancer is a “systemic” imbalance.
In other words, it is a problem with the entire “system” of the
interrelated parts of the body. This being so, appropriate treatment
must be for the total “environment” of the body.
Cancer cells are constantly being created in the body. It’s an ongoing
process that has been going on forever. In fact, God has miraculously
created our immune systems with the ability to seek out and destroy
cancer cells. However, tumors begin when more cancerous cells are
being created than an overworked, depleted immune system can
destroy. Cutting out the tumor does not usually fix the problem.
Remember, a tumor is just an uncontrolled growth of cells, and is
just a symptom of cancer, not the cause.
However, tumors do have the ability to migrate to different parts of
the body and grow out of control there as well, so I am not saying
that tumors are irrelevant. They may compress surrounding
structures, and their waste products may be toxic to the rest of the
body. This being so, they oftentimes interfere with the function of
organs such as the brain, liver, kidney, and lungs, thus resulting in
death.
There are many different theories on what actually causes cancer.
􀂾 The External Toxin Theory – this theory holds that the
proliferation of cancer cells is caused by external toxins.
External toxins are chemicals and other materials created
largely from industry and carelessness. These chemicals have
saturated our water, food, and the very air we breathe. You
can’t see, feel, or smell many toxins – at least, not right
away. We don’t realize their affects until we come down
with a chronic disease (like cancer) after years of exposure.
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
104
Over 4 billion pounds of toxic chemicals are released by
industry into the nation’s environment each year, including
72 million pounds of recognized carcinogens. The link
between external toxins and cancer cells is irrefutable.
Cancer treatment and prevention are focused on avoiding
and eliminating exposure to these toxins. I believe the
external toxin theory is a piece of the cancer puzzle, but not
the entire puzzle.
􀂾 The Microbe Theory – this theory holds that cancer is
caused by pleomorphic (literally “shape changing”)
microbes, such as fungus, yeast, bacteria, and parasites. It is
irrefutable that fungus, mold, yeast, bacteria, parasites, and
viruses are related to cancer. It is well known and well
documented that some fungal infections were actually
misdiagnosed as leukemia. As a matter of fact, this
pleomorphic microbe is so highly involved in the formation
of cancer that it is sometimes misdiagnosed as cancer. Many
prominent, maverick researchers over the last 100 years
have observed “pleomorphism” with the aid of dark field
microscopes. Pleomorphism is based on the belief that
fungus, mold, yeast, and bacteria are all merely different
stages in the life cycle of microbes. Of course, mainstream
medicine is still entrenched in Pasteur’s monomorphic
theory, thus pleomorphism is scoffed at by most
microbiologists who also say that the human body is
normally sterile, despite the fact that there is no convincing
proof of this and a lot of evidence against it. Based on my
research, the microbe theory is a huge piece of the cancer
puzzle.
􀂾 The Internal Rebel Theory – this is the predominant theory
of Big Medicine. This theory holds that the wild overgrowth
of cancer cells is a kind of genetic rebellion within the body,
where one’s own cells rebel and destroy the body which
produced them. Logically, if this theory is correct, then it
only makes sense to do whatever it takes to squelch the
rebel. This is why doctors try to cut and burn the cancer out
of the body, or poison the cancer with toxic medicines, or
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
105
send radiation throughout the body to kill these internal
rebels. With orthodox medicine, these are the standard
“treatment” protocols: slash, poison, and burn. These are the
only approved treatments inside the “orthodox cancer box.”
Doctors are placed in the box during medical school and are
required to stay in this box once they begin to practice
medicine. Those who dare to think “outside the box” are
condemned by Big Medicine, and their therapies are
blacklisted (without evidence, proof, investigation, or
substantiation) as “unproven” and “dangerous” therapies.
Unfortunately, this type of approach kills both cancerous
and healthy cells. As a result, many cancer patients die from
the “treatments” rather than from the actual disease.
My research over the past 10 years has resulted in a synthesis of my
theory on what causes cancer, and also what we can do to stop
cancer. My theory, and I am not alone, is that cancer is caused by a
microorganism (i.e. bacteria, fungus, mold, yeast), herein referred to
as the “cancer microbe.” These cancer microbes are pleomorphic, i.e.
they have the ability to change into many (“pleo”) forms (“morph”)
depending on the environment in which they exist and several other
factors.
Under healthy conditions, the immune system keeps the cancer
microbe latent, non-invasive, and in check. However, the immune
system is compromised by a plethora of circumstances, including old
age, a poor diet, an acidic internal terrain, chemicals, external toxins,
radiation, chemotherapy, mycotoxins, emotional stress,
contaminated foods, and/or a predisposed genetic susceptibility. One
(or many) of these conditions can give rise to the cancer microbe
mutating into a pathogenic (disease-causing) organism.
The balance of our internal terrain is important because it
determines whether these cancer microbes have fertile soil (i.e. an
acidic environment with a lack of oxygen) which leads to the
microbes mutating into pathogenic forms. Once the microbes have
mutated into a pathogenic form, they have the ability to break
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
106
through the cell walls (which may already be destabilized by
external toxins and chemicals) and the cellular DNA. Once inside
the cell, these microbes can further disrupt the cells ability to
produce energy via aerobic (with oxygen) respiration. These injured
cells (which are unable to produce energy aerobically) begin to
produce energy via anaerobic (without oxygen) respiration, also
called fermentation.
The cells of the human body function by burning sugar in oxygen to
provide energy. The waste products are carbon dioxide and water.
However, if there is insufficient oxygen at the cellular level, the
burn will be incomplete, and anaerobic respiration will begin,
forming carbon monoxide and lactic acid, which lower the
intracellular pH of the cell. The body cannot easily rid itself of
carbon monoxide since it prevents the hemoglobin from picking up
fresh oxygen at the lungs, and the body temperature is lowered. The
lactic acid can build up in the system, clogging nerve signal
pathways, eventually crystallizing and causing degeneration.
Once anaerobic respiration has begun, it perpetuates and reinforces
itself, due to the fact that the process doesn’t produce carbon
dioxide, which is responsible for extracting oxygen out of
hemoglobin. Without oxygen, there is no carbon dioxide...thus
there is no oxygen...thus there is no carbon dioxide...and the cycle
continues. In the acid medium of the anaerobic cell, the genetic
blueprint of the cell (DNA) is easily damaged, which results in
impairment to the cell’s control mechanism (the p53 gene). The p53
gene is responsible for producing proteins that cause normal
programmed cell death (apoptosis), however, when the p53 gene is
damaged, the cell rapidly duplicates and grows out of control, thus
cancer cells can live indefinitely.
Let me explain apoptosis, since this is a very important concept: in
normal cells, apoptosis is a “form” of cell death. When a cell’s DNA
is damaged, the cell will “commit suicide” in an attempt to keep the
damage from reproducing and forming a cancer cell. Your immune
system is continually working to keep you healthy and tries to clean
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
107
up and get rid of cancerous cells. However, before your immune
system even has a chance to kick in, and because a cell with
damaged DNA can become cancer, apoptosis occurs. This is an
“automatic” process, one we might say occurs at the lowest level of
our immune system. Simply put, cells are “programmed” to replace
themselves when the DNA becomes damaged.
This programming can be found in the p53 gene (the tumorsuppressing
gene). In the cell, the p53 protein binds DNA at specific
locations and stimulates another gene to produce a protein called
p21. In turn, p21 suppresses a division-stimulating protein (cdk2) to
prevent the cell from passing through to the next stage of cell
division. When the p53 gene is altered or damaged and can no
longer bind DNA effectively, the p21 protein is not available to act
as the “stop signal” for cell division.
Since the p53 gene is damaged in cancer cells, the p21 protein is
unable to stop cell division. Thus, the cancer cells don’t undergo
normal programmed cell death (apoptosis), and they continue to
multiply unchecked, which eventually leads to a “tumor” (a mass of
fermenting cells). Studies have shown that it is possible to revert
cancerous cells into normal cells through balancing the body’s pH,
which in turn normalizes the respiratory process of the pathogenic
cells (converting them back to aerobic respiration), thus reactivating
the p53 gene. Once the p53 gene is re-activated, the
converted cells eventually die off from normal apoptosis – thus
cancer is reversible.
That’s right. Reversible. According to Dr. David Gregg, “The
proposed cure, as an alternative to protocols that focus on killing the
cancer cells, is to restart aerobic respiration which allows the cells to
revert back to being quasi-normal cells again. Genetic damage is not
corrected, but if the cells are held in a normal state of aerobic
respiration, with time they will go through the normal process of
programmed cell death and the cancer cells are permanently
eliminated.” www.krysalis.net
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
108
Why Some Get Cancer and Not Others
Let me ask you this question: why don’t we have a forest fire each
time that someone throws a burning cigarette out a car window?
There are many reasons why a burning cigarette may not start a
forest fire.
1. Perhaps the cigarette falls on the pavement rather than
directly onto the grass
2. Perhaps there was a recent rain and the grass is wet, thus it
will not ignite
3. Perhaps the grass is dry, but the cigarette is snuffed before it
can start a fire
4. Perhaps it starts a fire but the grass is surrounded by water
and cannot spread into the forest
5. Or perhaps a fire begins, but then the wind blows so hard
that it blows the fire out
In the burning cigarette example above (which I have read many
times on the Internet, but I think it was Tanya Harter Pierce who
initially used this analogy), the cigarette represents one of the many
potential causes of cancer, like toxins, while the forest fire
represents cancer. The pavement and the wet grass and the wind all
represent the internal control mechanisms that prevent cancer, such
as a healthy immune system, a balanced pH, and oxygenated cells.
Given the same exposure to the same toxins over the same period of
time, someone with a healthy immune system may have no adverse
effects while someone with a compromised immune system may
develop cancer. Do you follow my drift? We see the evidence of
this truth constantly around us. One person in an office gets a very
bad cold. The one sitting next to him doesn’t get a sniffle. Certainly
both were exposed to the same microorganisms. But what is the
difference? One of them has a healthy immune system while the
other does not.
The answer also may involve heredity, to a limited extent. Perhaps
their genetic makeup, with their inherited DNA, successfully resists
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
109
cellular mutations and damage by outside toxins and carcinogens.
Perhaps their acid buffering systems are better suited to maintaining
homeostasis within the body’s pH system. So, despite years of
exposure to external toxins, chemicals, tobacco, and eating a poor
diet, they will not develop cancer, while others exposed to the same
toxins will develop cancer. In other words, the propensity to
develop cancer may be partly genetic.
However, human cancer is primarily attributable to chemical
pollutants, horrible eating habits, and unhealthy lifestyles, not
genetics, according to recent research by Paul Lichtenstein of the
Karolinska Institute of Stockholm, Sweden, who led a giant study of
89,576 twins and reported results in the 2000 New England Journal
of Medicine (NEJM). The researchers found even an identical twin
has about a 90% chance of not getting the same cancer as his or her
cancer-afflicted twin.
So, no matter what your genetic predisposition, there are a
multitude of steps you can take to minimize your cancer risk if you
don’t have cancer, and there are scores of successful treatment
protocols you can use if you do have cancer. Or, you can choose to
bury your head in the sand, allow your irrational trust in Big
Medicine to blind you from the truth, and think happy thoughts
(like many of our friends have done).
History 101
In order to better understand the scientific basis behind my cancer
theory, let’s travel back in time to the 1850s and learn about the
scientific “duel” of two Frenchmen – Louis Pasteur and Antoine
Beauchamp. Both men had bacteriological theories of disease, but
they disagreed about the origin and character of the bacteria. Little
did they know that the winner of their duel would influence the
course of medicine forever.
Pasteur promoted what is referred to as the “germ theory” of disease.
He hypothesized that disease arises from microbes outside the body
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
110
(germs). He believed that each microbe has a constant shape and
color (i.e. monomorphic – “having one form”). He also believed that
each disease and illness was caused by a unique microbe which
entered the body, and that disease can only be caused by microbes or
bacteria that invade the body from the outside. Therefore, the only
way to cure diseases is to kill the invader.
Beauchamp promoted what is referred to as the “cellular theory“ of
disease. He hypothesized that disease arises from microbes within
the cells of the body. He hypothesized that microbes can go through
diverse stages of growth and they can mutate into various growth
forms within their life cycle. In other words, he believed that the
microbes were pleomorphic (“many forms”). His theory was that
when the host organism (i.e. person) became unbalanced and unable
to maintain homeostasis, then these microbes would mutate and
become pathogenic. In other words, it is the condition of the host
organism is the primary cause of disease. Beauchamp called these
organisms “microzymas,” meaning “small ferments.”
Claude Bernard, another French scientist, entered into the debate
with the theory that it was actually the environment that is the
determining factor in disease. He agreed with Beauchamp in his
belief that microbes do mutate, but Bernard asserted that these
mutations are all a result of the environment to which they are
exposed. Therefore, Bernard’s theory was that disease in the body is
dependent upon the state of the internal biological terrain.
Pasteur went to great lengths to disprove Beauchamp and Bernard’s
theory. Due largely to his wealth and political connections, he was
able to convince the scientific community that his theory was
correct, despite the fact that he had never been educated in science!
However, on his deathbed, Pasteur admitted that his germ theory
had flaws and that Bernard was correct. He said “Bernard was
correct …the terrain is everything.” I think his pride prohibited him
from admitting that Beauchamp was also correct, as he had been
Pasteur’s nemesis for so long. However, it was too little, too late.
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
111
The mainstream scientists had already embraced his monomorphic
germ theory.
In the 150 years since the birth of Pasteur’s monomorphic theory, it
has become so widely accepted that it is seldom even discussed in
conventional medical circles today. His theory was the genesis of
modern allopathic (conventional) medicine, which claims that
monomorphic microbes from an external source invade the body
and are the first cause of infectious disease.
The monomorphic theory also gave birth to the technique of
vaccination that was blindly begun in 1796 by Edward Jenner, who
took pus from the running sores of sick cows and injected it into the
blood of his “patients.” Thus, the vile practice of vaccination and
immunization was born. Also resulting from the erroneous germ
theory was the development of antibiotics, the first of which was
penicillin in 1940. Simply stated, an “antibiotic” is the poisonous
waste from one germ used in the attempt to kill another.
Unfortunately, conventional cancer treatments do not address the
underlying conditions of cancer, such as microbes, our pH balance,
and oxygen at the cellular level. Rather, conventional cancer
treatment protocols focus on treating the symptoms of cancer, such
as tumors.
Cancer “Mavericks”
Fortunately, Beauchamp’s pleomorphic cellular theory has been
embraced by many scientists over the past century, including Dr.
Günther Enderlein, a German professor of microbiology. Enderlein
used a special technique called darkfield microscopy which allowed
him to view live human blood. Through this technique, he
discovered that there are tiny microbes in the blood which he called
“endobionts.” He agreed with Beauchamp’s theory that as the
internal terrain changes, these microbes could mutate into
pathogenic organisms that would cause disease. Like Beauchamp,
Enderlein believed that disease is a general condition of our
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
112
environment, and that germs are the primary symptoms (not the
cause) of disease. He also found that there were both healthy and
unhealthy forms of every germ.
One of the most profound books on the cancer microbe is Sick &
Tired by Dr. Robert Young. Young, a microbiologist, has viewed
cancer microbes (which he calls “microzymas”) via live blood
analysis and has seen these organisms evolving into bacteria, yeast,
fungus, and molds. On page 29, Young states that through watching
live blood, “one can actually see bacteria, yeast, fungus, and mold
feeding and growing as the blood loses its nutrition and oxygen.”
His thesis is that understanding the principles of our body’s pH,
which he refers to as the “mediator of mortality,” pleomorphism,
and our internal terrain is the key to preventing disease.
A fascinating quote is found on page 62 when Dr. Young writes, “I
have found that the cells of the human body are not living per se,
only that which makes up the cell – the microzyma. When a cell is
disturbed physically or emotionally it begins to disorganize (die),
and the microzymas that make up that cell, being perpetually alive,
only change form and function. This is because the microzyma is
the vital unit of created life and endowed with the amazing ability
to create its own environment for survival.” I highly recommend
this book, as it is by far the best book I have read on the cancer
microbe.
In his book, Cancer - Cause, Cure and Cover-up, Ron Gdanski
presents the belief that our immune system is oftentimes
compromised from alcohol, cigarettes, pollutants, chemicals,
microwaves, hydrocarbons, lack of minerals and enzymes, and many
other toxins. In healthy individuals with normal immune systems,
the cancer microbe remains harmless. However, when our immune
system is compromised, the cell walls are adversely affected, thus
allowing the microbes to enter the cell and cause cellular mutations.
He proposes that cancer research is misdirected since the cause of
cancer is not due to genetic mutations but rather the result of fungal
microbes that interfere with the body’s natural healing process
when an injury occurs.
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
113
Gdanski proposes that cell walls are modified by fungal parasites
when healing takes place in a low oxygen environment that favors
fermentation. The cells that result from this process do not bond
with the surrounding cells as in the normal healing process because
of their modified cell wall construction. As a result the body does
not turn off the stimulation of cell growth like it does in the normal
healing process and the mutated cells continue to divide. When this
happens, cancer is the result. Gdanski provides a convincing
argument with extensive references and documented studies to
support his viewpoint. He highlights cancer research which
demonstrates that microbes are present in all cancer cells.
Dr. Gaston Naessens invented a unique microscope that allows living
tissue to be viewed at 30,000 times magnification. He observed tiny
microorganisms (somatids – “little bodies”) hidden in the blood
plasma, which are able to change from one form to another in a
regular cycle. He discovered that in a healthy person, the somatids
have a 3 stage cycle, but in an unhealthy person, the cycle is 16
stages. Interestingly, he found that fermentation begins (between
stages three and four) as a result of cellular disturbances that can be
produced by exposure to chemical pollution and radiation, among
other things. Naessens learned that the unhealthy stages of the
somatid include bacteria, yeast, and fungus. He has successfully
treated many thousands of cancer patients with 714X, a treatment
which provides nitrogen to the cancer cells and unclogs the lymph
system. However, his treatment only works well on newly
diagnosed patients.
During the last half of the 20th century, much research on the cancer
microbe was performed by a quartet of female doctors: Dr. Virginia
Livingston, Dr. Eleanor Alexander, Dr. Irene Diller, and Dr.
Florence Seibert. Their published research provides indisputable
evidence that bacteria are implicated in cancer. In 1970, they
isolated a specific type of highly pleomorphic microorganism which
was found consistently in cancer. They discovered that this microbe
was able to resemble bacteria, viruses, fungi, molds, yeasts, and
many other forms. These four women theorized that everyone has
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
114
the cancer microbe in their blood, tissue, and body fluids. When
their immune system is functioning properly, the cancer microbe is
harmless. However, when the immune system is weakened or tissue
is damaged, these microbes become aggressive and pathogenic,
producing inflammation, rapid growth, and hardening of the tissue.
Livingston named the cancer microbe “progenitor cryptocides“
which means “hidden killers.”
Dr. Alan Cantwell, M.D., has written an excellent book
summarizing their work, entitled Four Women Against Cancer. In
the book, Dr. Cantwell explores the microbial cause of cancer (and
other diseases). In my opinion, you won’t find a better overview of
the scientific justification for a bacterial etiology of cancer and the
great lengths to which the Cancer Industry will go to suppress this
research.
In a recent email, Dr. Cantwell recommended that I read up on the
cancer research of Dr. Doug Robinson, a medical doctor trained in
oncology from the University of Arkansas. Dr. Robinson has a
background in cellular biology research, and is not only shedding
brand new light on cancer microbe, but is doing so via “state-of-the
art” molecular biology. Robinson’s studies have demonstrated that
there is a complex relationship between eukaryotes (non-bacterial
cells containing a nucleus and chromosomes and which become
specialized in their function), and prokaryotes (cells without a
nucleus making up what we know as bacteria, viruses, fungi, etc.).
Dr. Robinson maintains that through a complex biological process
known as “horizontal DNA transfer,” eukaryotes can pass on genetic
qualities to prokaryotes imparting specialized functions to them, and
establishing a profound relationship between the transformed
bacteria and cancer. If you want to learn more about Dr. Robinson’s
work, please visit his website at www.denovobiologic.com.
Did you know that there are 400,000 species of fungi, out of which
400 are pathogens? In 1990, Elizabeth Moore-Landecker revealed
fungi and their mycotoxins are able to cause genetic variations and
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
115
mutations. The fact that mycotoxins (fungal toxins) can cause cancer
is not up for grabs. In the American Cancer Society Textbook of
Clinical Oncology, 2nd ed. 1995, it states “mycotoxins are genotoxic
carcinogens, and exposure begins in utero and in mother’s milk,
continuing throughout life; these conditions favor the occurrence of
disease.”
Dr. Doug Kaufman has noted many similarities between cancer and
fungus. Let’s have a look at some fascinating facts which he points
out:
􀂾 Both cancer cells and fungi can metabolize nutrients
anaerobically
􀂾 Both cancer cells and fungi must have sugar in order to
survive and will die in the absence of sugar
􀂾 Both cancer cells and fungi produce lactic acid
􀂾 Both cancer cells and fungi can be impacted by antifungal
medicines
In his book, The Germ that Causes Cancer, Kaufman hypothesizes
that cancer is a deep-rooted fungal infection that our immune
system fails to recognize. Why? He believes that fungi and human
cells unite to form a hybrid cell with altered DNA. In the
relationship between the fungi and human cell, the fungi are the
dominant partner and are capable of overcoming the natural
defenses and operation of the human host, since the cell is still
sufficiently similar to one of our own cells. This invasion occurs
during the single-celled spore form of its life cycle. Fungus is
dimorphic (i.e. during its life cycle it takes two forms). According to
Kaufman, the fungus family that causes disease in humans is
Ascomycetes (literally “sac fungus”) and numbers almost two
thousand, including yeasts, molds, and penicillin.
Kaufman also believes that antibiotics, many of which begin as
fungi, can contribute to the development of cancer. He hypothesizes
that perhaps many cases of cancer are actually misdiagnosed and are
in reality fungal infections/overgrowths. Consider this: fungal
infections not only can be extremely contagious, but they also go
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
116
hand in hand with leukemia (every oncologist knows this). For
example, in 1999, Dr. Meinolf Karthaus watched three different
children with “leukemia” suddenly go into remission upon receiving
a triple antifungal drug cocktail for their “secondary” fungal
infections. Amazing, huh?
I gleaned my theory on the cancer microbe from several
independent researchers who all reported the abundance of certain
microbes in all cancer patients. I have already mentioned Dr.
Günther Enderlein, and there are many others who independently
(without knowledge of each other’s research) have come to the same
conclusion. Many different names have been given to the microbe,
though they all likely refer to the same thing:
􀂾 Dr. Günther Enderlein called them “endobionts”
􀂾 Dr. Wilhelm Reich called them “T-bacilli“
􀂾 Dr. Royal Rife called them “cryptocides primordiales“
􀂾 Dr. Virginia Livingston called them “progenitor
cryptocides“
􀂾 Dr. Kurt Donsbach called them “kleptic microbes“
􀂾 Dr. Gaston Naessens calls them “somatids“
􀂾 Beauchamp called them “microzymas“
Several of these brilliant scientists discovered methods to either
control or destroy the cancer microbe, thus leading to a cure or
remission of the cancer. In line with Beauchamp’s cellular theory,
they discovered that the cancer microbe generally begins to multiply
when the person’s health declines. Unfortunately, modern medicine
is so entrenched in Pasteur’s monomorphic germ theory that they
refuse to believe that microbes are pleomorphic and can change into
organisms which cause cancer. But why do microbiologists appear
to disagree over exactly what the pleomorphic “cancer microbe” is?
Well, if Dr. Doug Robinson’s findings are correct, then eukaryoteprokaryote
created bacteria are “unique” in the sense that they can
emulate certain bacteria but on a genetic level, be “radically
different” in terms of their identifying characteristics. This is highly
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
117
significant, and is a partial answer to our question. Microbiologists
disagree over exactly what the cancer bacterium is because it is like
no other bacterium we’ve ever been accustomed to studying via
traditional methods!!
According to Webster Kehr, “Different cancer researchers have
different understandings of this pleomorphic microbe. As a result
there have been several different descriptions of this cancer microbe
in the cancer cell. Some people call it a virus, some a fungus, one
called it a mould, others called it an acid-fast bacteria (which
mutated into or from a fungus) or mycobacterium, and one called it
an amoeba (e.g. trichomonad). Which of these is correct? Probably
all of them.”
Step-by-Step Synopsis
So how is it possible that a pleomorphic microbe can be the final
cause of cancer? Consider this possible explanation from Webster
Kehr:
1. Due to a weakened, damaged or incorrectly structured (i.e.
incorrectly structured by having trans-fatty acids being part of
the membrane) cell membrane, which can be caused by a
carcinogen or many other things, a microbe already in the body,
which has already morphed into a fungus, mould or bacteria, is
able to enter inside a normal cell,
2. Once inside, the microbe intercepts the glucose entering the cell
(most microbes feed on glucose),
3. The microbe excretes “mycotoxins,” with are highly acidic, and it
excretes dangerous hormones and perhaps a thick slime
(mycotoxins are the normal excretions of microbes),
4. Because mycotoxins are very, very acidic, the inside of the cell
becomes highly acidic, which is a characteristic of cancer cells,
5. The cell’s mitochondria (which convert glucose into energy) get
very little glucose because the microbe has intercepted most of
the glucose,
Chapter 6 – The Facts About Cancer Cancer – Step Outside the Box
118
6. What the cell’s mitochondria do get to “eat” is lots of mycotoxins
and other harmful garbage, which it cannot convert into energy,
7. The mitochondria’s energy level (ATP provides the key energy of
a cell, but ATP gets its energy from the mitochondria) plummets
because it is living in a sea of filth, meaning the ATP energy
drops,
8. Signals are sent to the insulin receptors and glucose receptors on
the cell membranes to become hyperactive and grab more
glucose (insulin binds to glucose, thus the insulin receptors are
used to get glucose into the cells),
9. More glucose enters the cell, but most of the glucose is
intercepted again by the microbe and the mitochondria are again
bathing in an increasingly large sea of mycotoxins, dangerous
hormones and possibly slime.
10. Because there is a limit to how high the activity of these two
types of receptors can become there is no way for the
mitochondria (and thus the ATP) to get enough glucose and
energy,
11. The cell is now officially cancerous because its energy level
drops (the ATP energy levels can be compared to the steps of a
ladder) and the cell is defined to be anaerobic (i.e. fermenting
glucose instead of burning glucose).
-- www.new-cancer-treatments.org/Cancer/OCC_Theories.html